The magistrate continued with the hearing and went to the possible presentation of the witness to an appeals court, which will define whether it gives rise to his story – which would imply a new hearing – or reject it, which would lead the court in charge of the case to define a date for the closing allegations of both parties.
After these allegations, the judge in charge of the case – which is still unknown if he will continue to be love – will have 15 days to give a resolution. The Maldonado prosecutor who investigated the accident, Sebastián Robles, requested eight years in prison for Rocca for a crime of guilty homicide.
Experts denounced “very serious mistakes” and lack of evidence in official accident expertise in springs
Sources present at the Audience on Tuesday indicated to The observer that the specialists marked several “very serious errors” in the expertise presented by the Road Accidentology Cabinet, especially in the reports of “Planimetry” and the “Mechanics of the Collision”.
Donnángelo related to The observer That another of the experts who testified reported that the “efractions” (damages caused by the metal of the car in the asphalt) in the center of the route show that the Argentine car “came along the opposite path and seconds before he returned to his lane.”
The lawyer indicated that this hypothesis is not in the accidentology report because, according to the experts, “experts that were not made should have been performed.” The specialists denounced. According to Donnángelo, that “the bottom of the cars was not reviewed” nor were samples of metal remains in the asphalt to see if they were compatible with some of the vehicles.
For the defender, this “deficiency in the survey” caused the test to be lost confirmed by the hypothesis of his defense, which indicates that Rocca saw the car of the Argentines come and “when he wanted to make an evasive maneuver they returned to their path”, at which time they collided in front.
However, the lawyer understands that the lack of this test and the deficiencies in the expertise leads to “cannot be ruled out” its hypothesis, since “there are no elements that can lead to Rocca being responsible for the accident.”
On the other hand, the lawyer Abal indicated that although the experts marked several technical errors of the expertise, they failed to present a concrete theory opposite to that of the accidentology cabinet.
The witness of the four stories and a video they presented to discredit their theory
A notary who presented the different fines that Argentina was at the wheel was present at the audience on Tuesday when the accident occurred. Abal marked that the professional compared the amount of infractions that Rocca had, but while the accused had his driving notebook for a few months the woman had permission for years.
In addition, Augusto, a witness taken by prosecutor Robles who claimed to have seen the accident, and that this time was summoned by Rocca’s lawyers due to different inconsistencies in his version of the facts.
As reported The observer last week, the man changed his story of the events four times. In his last statement he said The car had been broken and it had been on the side of the route, When he saw Rocca’s car go “at full speed” And he followed. That was when he saw the accident.
However, after his statement the defenders of the Argentine driver consulted him If he had made “more statements” and he denied itwhat was quickly counterattacked with lawyers with the story of the different testimonies.
Then, they said that Last Thursday, April 24 Augustus contacted Ignacio Durán, Rocca ex -book, to consult him If you could contact the accused “because he had information to help him.” The message was sent by WhatsApp and was eliminated after a listening, but Durán recorded it with another cell phone and sent them to Donnángelo and Sasson. After listening to the audio in front of the judge, eThe witness said they “hacked him” and put together his audio “with AI.”
In yesterday the lawyers showed a video with which, they say, they discredited the version of Rocca. Donnángelo indicated that the recording, taken by a camera from a farm located 3.3 km from the site of the clash six minutes after it happened, shows that Augusto was “50 seconds” behind Rocca on Route 104.
According to the lawyer, so that Augusto’s story is “plausible” would have to, in a few minutes, have passed to Rocca, stopped 450 meters from the clash (point that the witness himself marked) and then having followed him again until he saw the accident.
In addition, he postulated that the testimony presented by the Prosecutor’s Office also changed four times with respect to the time it remained on the side of the road: he said they were “five, ten minutes”, then “a little while”, then “a lot” and finally “less than 30 minutes.” In none of the cases, he added, it is condemned with what was seen in the video.
The cross between a father of the Argentines and Rocca’s father
Abal indicated that on Tuesday there were several people close to both parties at the hearing, who had different words crosses throughout the judicial instance, which even led the judge to ask the departure of several of those present.
The lawyer reported that one of the parents of the Argentines and Rocca’s father also had a respectful crossing of words. The victims’ father told him that “he forgave Rocca from the accident, but not to the cause.”
He even snapped that “if they had behaved differently” their son “would not be in house prison” two years ago and “he would not eat years in Cana.”
The theory that Rocca worked until shortly before the accident
The lawyer of the Argentines said that at the Audience Monday there were other witnesses of the Defense of Rocca, all linked to the accused, including the young man who was co -pilot of the Argentine in the accident, who reported that the woman’s car was the one who changed the path.
Other witnesses said that Rocca “worked all night” as part of a producer before the accident. However, Abal presented them with a video in which the involved in “an after” was seen a few hours after the clash.
According to the lawyer, after showing the recording to each of the testimonies he asked them if Rocca was actually “party”, and “everyone recognized” that it was.
Related news :