The accused who has that summary had been apprehended by members of the Blue Patrol command that were summoned, by calling 911, to intervene in what was happening.
Scenario of this fact, yesterday Tuesday afternoon, it was a land located on Leyría, in the block included by Calle 3 and Mujica.
Security and judicial spokesmen identified the young man who was arrested as Luis Alberto González Pereyra.
26 years old, today Wednesday at noon he had been taken to the courts of Azul to be investigated by the illicit that now imputes him.
During that hearing, held at the UFI 2 by prosecutor David Carballo, the defendant chose to refuse to testify and subsequently arranged for liberty to regain.
At the same time, the criminal process that was initiated ended up being declared as “of Flagrance”, so the actions were sent from the aforementioned Prosecutor’s Office to the UFI 9 that Laura Margaretic conducts.
According to what was reported in a report released from the Departmental Police Station of Blue Security, yesterday Tuesday the now accused was apprehended by CPA agents when it was inside the land that apparently intended to usurp.
At that time he was already building, “as referred to by police sources. And when asked if he was the owner of the land, he could not prove the property of that lot.
The inquiries made by the Police allowed to establish that the property belongs to a 72 -year -old neighbor.
Once located, that man exhibited to the security personnel the papers that show that he is the legitimate owner of that land to which the young man who later was apprehended had entered. Apparently, with intentions to usurp.
Both that neighbor victim from what happened and others that have land in that area of the city – according to the time – have been suffering for situations such as the one that resulted in the apprehension of the young González Pereyra.
That problem, which is not new according to what they told lot owners located in that sector of Azul, has also implied that, in order to eradicate it, different claims to the CEAL were formulated. Specifically, so that there is a better lighting in the area turned into the scene of this case of usurpation, considering that they pay month by month by that public lighting service that, according to the neighbors themselves, continues to be poor.
Related news :