Morena, the government party, has held its recent national Council meeting at the request of the head of the Presidency of the Republic, who, despite the license requested to its militancy last September, formulates a set of recommendations on the conduct of people in positions of leadership, popular or administrative representation in the three government orders. Given the circumstances that this political organization lives, it has been the birth of the mountains.
It is not a Mexican, but worldwide issue; Who exercises the highest political position in the State must assume the leadership of the party to which it belongs and supports it. The reproaches, calls for attention and recommendations of Dr. Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo Peders and leaders of Morena move to the question of who really leads to the party? And, even more, are there currents who live with the one of the license militant and question the unit of the command in whom the federal executive assumed on October 1, 2024?
The Decalogue of the Presidential Charter reveals his concerns. The ideological approach is, as much, poor or almost absent; And considerations about the political moment and the challenges for party training are barely distinguishable and lack depth, although the content of some points deserves registration. I do not mean the elements that unmarked it of the “paraphernalia of power” or parliamentary tourism, but to those called not to use public resources for personal promotion no longer to make agreements with organized or white -collar crime.
The letter condenses what happens in Morena in the eyes of who sends it; It is the recognition of facts, behaviors and situations. Some are irregularities, other abuses and some more alleged illicit; The society that observes has it in sight and will, at the time, conclusions. The most obvious and important issue for politics is the call for unity and the affirmation of its value for the party.
That is the most significant deficit. It is not with missives to the amalgam of passes and currents, where a history of the PRI and the PRD stands out, or the leadership inherited from former president López, nepotism included, as the party organization may assume the role that the National Palace tenant has imagined, but with decisions that reveal that the helm has assumed. He was transferred in an election with too many advantages and absence of equity, but not the game. Why not claim it to give that livelihood to your government, which also presents the appreciable absence of the Secretary of the Interior in political tasks?
Perhaps because he assumes not needing him in the light of the results of the opinion surveys about the approval to his person. In the most recent, Check Mitofsky gives 70.2 percent and The financial 81 percent. It is true that the valuation of government management of these measurements shows another face; In the first 79.8 percent believe that there is corruption in their government and in the second 61 percent gives a negative qualification to the action to combat organized crime. In the survey a month ago Latinus Its approval was 80 percent, considered by 64 percent that the main problem of the country is insecurity, while 62 percent would be in favor of investigating whether former president López has links with organized crime.
The high approval of Dr. Sheinbaum seems to be explained by two components: the improvement in people’s income, particularly due to the increase in the minimum wage and subsidies linked to social programs; and the support of the difficulties raised by US President Donald Trump and the rejection of pressures that undermine the national determination to act internally and externally.
There is no doubt about government priority on these two fronts. In every way, labor income and access to budgetary resources by segments of the population where the greatest needs are constituted in the priority of the government. Any political option must assume that reality, since the permanence of its economic effects has become a requirement to be heard and try to persuade.
The support for the nationalist conviction of our society is clear, but not exempt from risks for the government, given the uncertainty of the behaviors of the US president. For reasons that seem obvious of dependence and relative weakness, it has not been faced and has given up, but the provocations have gone and returned; The last one, around the approach to involve our neighbor’s army in the fight against drug cartels, which was made public there and here motivated its use for the rhetoric of last weekend on the tour of Dr. Sheinbaum in the State of Mexico. Trump’s statement was not pleasant and better chose to retrace the carelessness of taking to the square, propaganda and the media which belongs to the diplomatic exchange.
Slip that is recorded, next to which it seems to have gone unnoticed, even because of the implications for the bodies responsible for asserting sovereignty. The USS Serly destroyer of the American Navy, identified in international waters contiguous to the Mexican patrimonial sea last April, entered Mexican waters and docked in the port of Veracruz at the end of this month without authorization to access the national territory. Instead of becoming the management before the Senate (art. 76, fr. III, of the Constitution), the Secretary of the Navy intended to justify it (statement 20/2025) as the normal practice of a supply and rest operation, ignoring that every foreign vessel -Mercantil or war- can enter the national waters in terms of the provisions of the Constitution and international law (art. 10 of the Federal Law of the Sea). The constitutional protection regime of sovereignty was violated. Who is responsible?
The approval has and gains image, but does not provide government capacity or party leadership, if one and the other are not worked.
Related news :