“There are some who doubt the L-Grant disease. Some say, and hopefully it is not true and is taking care of their health, that the L-Grant strategy to avoid the problems that the statements would bring In this program that Maxi El Brother said, “he said.
In that sense, he expanded his theory and explained: “By linking it with drugs and other issues, it would endanger your freedom“.” This could be harmed in the case because it has a behavior guideline, “added Martín Candalaft.
“I was talking with Luis Perdomo that day, when the program ended, and He spoke even the possibility of a transplant “Mariana Fabbiani revealed with concern. “I hope is a lie what he said here and that of health is fine“Tatiana Schapiro also said.
Embed – Concern for the health status of L -Grant
justice failed in favor of Tamara Báez in its conflict of interest with L-Grant: the verdict
This Friday, the resolution of justice was known in the legal conflict between Tamara Báez and L-Grant for the food share for her daughter in common, Jamaica.
After several months of comings and turns, the judicial ruling favored Tamara, who had initiated the claim with the aim of guaranteeing better conditions for raising the little girl.
-“This is the new agreement, Tamara won L-Grant in Justice, the judge resolved the increase in food quota,” said journalist Matías Vázquez in the Pure Show program while showing the image with the official resolution issued by the judge who intervened in the case.
Previously, it had been announced that Elian Valenzuela, better known as L-Grant, transferred to his daughter’s mother an amount of 500 dollars per month, which is equivalent to approximately 700 thousand Argentine pesos. However, after the judicial ruling, the artist must begin to comply with the new sum established by justice.
In subsequent statements, Juan Pablo Merlo, a lawyer from Tamara, gave more details about what was decided by the judge: “There is a question linked to the update of the food quota. Tamara was receiving a minimum amount. Recall that Elian leads a life of luxuries and excesses, and it did not seem fair that her daughter did not have access to the same thing,” said the lawyer, justifying the claim and highlighting the differences in the style of life between the father and the daughter.
In addition, Merlo remarked that the ruling contemplates a more equitable and adequate quota to the economic context of both parties: “The judge failed in favor of Tamara with a more chord quota. I prefer not to say the exact amount because she does not live in a closed neighborhood and we do not want to expose it,” he explained, emphasizing the security of his client and the minor.
The lawyer also underlined the responsibility that Tamara has assumed in the raising of Jamaica since he was born: “Tamara is the one who takes care of her, who feeds her, who maintains her. Until now she has done everything to a lung. There are workers who earn much less and pass a higher fee than the one he was paying. Elian shows a high level of life, but with her only daughter she was handled with an amount that she did not reach for the food. firmly
To close, Merlo highlighted Tamara’s attitude in the midst of this family conflict, recognizing her patience and temperance in the complications: “She accepted that money so as not to have to deal with certain situations. She sought tranquility for her and for her daughter,” concluded the lawyer, making it clear that the priority was always the welfare of Jamaica.
