Privacy Policy Banner

We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

9 congressmen will denounce Petro for “threatening tone” against the legislative, in marches of May 1

Colombian President Gustavo Petro holds the sword he claims belonged to Simon Bolivar, known as “El Libertador”, (The Liberator), the commemoration of in Bogota, Colombia May 1, 2025. REUTERS/Luisa Gonzalez

A of nine congressmen will denounce the President of the Republic, Gustavo Petro, for using “threatening tone” against the legislative during the mobilizations of May 1, , in addition to commemorating the International Workers Day, the president resulted in the project for the popular consultation with which he seeks to endorse much of the labor reform that filed him in VII of the Senate, in mid -March.

Will be the outstanding jurist Wilson Ruiz, of Justice during the of former President Iván Duque, who assumed the legal representation of parliamentarians who have decided to initiate the legal against the Head of , according to the regional newspaper The country.

Now you can follow us in our WhatsApp Channel and in Facebook

Ruiz, accompanied by the lawyer Manuel Villanuevawill lead the judicial action on behalf of the congressmen belonging to the Legal Commission of Investigation and Accusation, they detailed in the Vallecaucano newspaper.

The complainant congressmen are Esperanza Andrade Serrano, Bedoya Pérez Berenice, Beatriz Lorena Ruiz Cuéllar, Honorio Miguel Henríquez Pinedo, Josué Alirio Barrera, Miguel Ángel Pinto Hernández, Nadya Biel Scaff, Norma Hurtado Sánchez y Ana Paola Agudelo Garcíathey indicated in the magazine Semana.

Ruiz explained that the president’s speech included references that congressmen consider threatening such as “He waved the flag to , a symbol that justifies atrocities in the name of ,” And he warned that, if the Senate does not approve the popular consultation, “the people revokes it,” he said in some sections of an interview he granted at the station Caracol Radio.

President Gustavo Petro in
President Gustavo Petro in the Plaza de Bolívar, during the day of May 1, 2025 – Andrea Puentes/Presidency

Ruiz added that the president attacked and insulted several legislators, which, according to him, his personal safety at risk. For this , the affected congressmen have decided to file the complaint with the Accusations Commission of the House of Representatives and also before the Inter -American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR).

The former minister emphasized that they will not limit themselves to expressing their indignation, but will take the case to the legal instances.

“The attacks on congressmen are unacceptable. I am willing to go to the last consequences to defend our democracy and our social state of law. If the president does not to the reason, a judge will do it, ”said Ruiz, according to Caracol Radio.

Former Minister of Justice Wilson
Former Minister of Justice Wilson Ruiz Orejuela made public his disagreements for the way in which the trial against former president Álvaro Uribe has been developed – credit provided to Infobae Colombia

Petrogenerated controversy with his statements in the Plaza de Bolívar to request support from the popular consultation that seeks to implement the Labor reformpreviously in the seventh commission of the Senate. During his speech, Petro said that congressmen who do not support this initiative will not be elected again, which unleashed criticism from various sectors.

The president’s speech included blunt terms against those who oppose the popular consultation, who described as “HP slaves”. In addition, he warned that the Colombian people could mobilize to revoke legislators who vote against the proposal.

Petro declared: “People of Colombia without . If they believe that is enough for them, and then in a session of the Senate, at midnight, they will vote to say ‘no’ to the consultation, the people of Colombia get up and revoke it”.

These statements generated immediate answers. Congressmen From different political criticized the tone and content of the speech, accusing the president of acting in an authoritarian way and of prioritizing personal interests on citizen needs.

Senator Nadia Blel, of the Conservative Party, expressed in an interview her discontent, noting that she expected a speech that united the country, but found a divisive message: “Yesterday, when we waited for a president to unite with his speech, a president who built and did not destroy … we saw the opposite”he said.

-

-
PREV Teenagers can receive the free vaccine against HPV until one day before they turn 19 | HEALTH
NEXT Trump questions the right to a fair trial and says that military action will not be necessary to annex canada | International