In the middle of the captures of the congressmen Iván Name and Andrés Calle, The Constitutional Court asked the Supreme Court of Justice to Disasters (UNGRD)to analyze the constitutionality of the social reforms of the government of President Gustavo Petro.
The document details as the first evidence: “full copy of the statements and interrogations reached by the former director and deputy director general of the National Unit for Risk Management, Olmedo de Jesús López Martínez and Sneyder Augusto Pinilla Álvarez. In turn, copy of the assurance measure imposed against the former council for the regions, Sandra Ortiz”.
De Ortiz, the High Court also requested the statements he has delivered both in the Attorney General’s Office and in the Instruction Chamber of the Supreme Court of Justice. The well -known “messenger” revealed in WEEK that with the silver of the UNGRD the election of Vladimir Fernández would also have been bought as magistrate of the Constitutional Court, the same that has to resolve the constitutional of the Petro pension reform.
-
The Constitutional Court explained in its request that Everything is part of the analysis of the demand presented by Senator Paloma Valencia against pension reform And the Court investigation against Name and Calle, which would demonstrate that in the second semester of 2023, they apparently received 4,000 million pesos in exchange for promoting that bill and the reform of the health system.

And he warned: “Given its severity and transcendence, it considers that it is of the greatest importance and relevance that the Plenary Chamber of the Court has, with the proper reservation, with the truthful and reliable information known so far by the authorities.”
Judge Jorge Enrique Ibáñez Najar explained to the Supreme Court that the information will have “assurance” taking into account that it is part of a reserved investigation.