The popular renewal bench not only submitted a request for reconsideration to vote again in the Plenary of the Congress for 10 years against the former president Martín Vizcarra Due to the dissolution of this state power in September 2019, but also to submit, again, the request for sanction against the former presidential Francisco Sagasti.
In the same way, Congressman Jorge Montoya, a spokesman for honor and democracy, presented orders to return to vote the disqualifications in the cases of Vizcarra and Sagasti. The resources also reach former Salvador del Solar (PCM), Rubén Vargas and José Elice (Interior).
In communication with Commercethe renewal spokesman, Alejandro Muñante, said that he signed four reconsideration orders to vote, again, in the Hemicycle the recommendation of disqualification against Sagasti and the former interior ministers Rubén Vargas and José Elice for the retirement of 18 generals of the Police in November 2020.
The fourth request is to evaluate the sanction to former Prime Minister Vicente Zeballos for the dissolution of Parliament in the Biscay Administration.
These are orders to reconsider the vote:
“Ayer [miércoles] It was a bad date, as they say. It was the eve of a long weekend, some congressmen connected virtually, others lost the communication product of being on a flight or on the road. And, for that reason, we lacked votes [para las inhabilitaciones]. Not that complaints have not had strength”He said.
Muñante indicated that the right in Congress had calculated the votes against and in abstention of the left bench.
Reconsideration presented on Wednesday, April 30.
“These reconsiderations are not for everyone. With respect to Salvador del Solar, a previous issue was approved to be withdrawn from the accusation [por la disolución del Congreso] For an expiration issue, although popular renewal voted against. This issue was settled. Although, from the plot he has not been declared innocent”, He said.
The popular renewal parliamentarian said that Congress did approved the lifting of the jurisdiction for Sagasti, Vargas and Elice, so that they are prosecuted for the alleged crime of abuse of authority in the justice system.
Muñante said it depends on the Board of Directors of Parliament, directed by Eduardo Sallejuana (app), define the date on which these reconsiderations would be seen.
He explained that, to approve the reconsiderations, 66 votes are required and that there are enabled to mark the 130 members of Congress.
“If the reconsiderations are approved, already for the underlying issue, which is disqualification, there are only those who are not part of the permanent commission and have to reach 66 votes,” he said.
The vote in the plenary
For Martín Vizcarra, an disqualification of ten years was raised, which was going to govern until 2035.
The plenary required 66 votes to approve the measure, but only reached 61 accessions. There were 12 positions against, mostly legislators of together for Peru-Voces of the people and the popular democratic block.
In addition, eight abstentions were recorded from Podemos Peru, the Magisterial Block, among others. In the case of Zeballos, there were only 64 votes in favor.
Regarding Sagasti, the minimum votes (66) that were required for disqualification were not reached. Since the subcommission he had also raised ten years.
Only 61 accessions were obtained, from Popular Force, Podemos Peru, App, Peru Libre, Popular Renewal and others. They opposed together for Peru-Voces of the people, socialist bench and democratic block.
Former President Sagasti did not appear before the Plenary of last Wednesday, he excused himself through an official letter addressed to Eduardo Sallejuana, head of Parliament. In the brief, he summed up the discharges he gave before the subcommission and the permanent commission.
“In conclusion, I have not infringed constitutional or legal provision or acts that correspond to the criminal types of the crime that is imputed to me,” he said.
Vizcarra already has two current disqualifications: one 10 years imposed in 2021 for the ‘vaccination’ case and another five years dating from 2022 for its links with companies when he was the holder of the MTC.
It was saved from a third sanction, this time accused of violating article 134 of the Constitution following the dissolution of the Congress in 2019.
Related news :