
The judge of the Dana, the magistrate of the number 3 of Catarroja, Nuria Ruiz Tobarra, closes the door for the case … from the hands and pass to the Superior Court of Justice of the Valencian Community. At least, that is one of the theories that is handled after a new car in which he refuses to impute the president of the Generalitat, Carlos Mazón, who as a aforementioned would force the case to pass to the high court and would no longer be in the hands of a judge who has obtained a great media impact after the forcefulness of his cars in relation to what happened on the day of the Dana.
One of the accusations in the process requested the imputation of the President of the Consell, Carlos Mazón, for not asking the Government for the national Emergency Declaration on the afternoon of the Dana. «However, it must be attended to what is resolved at the time by the TSJ in a car on December 23, 2024; The instruction continues its course and has given the opportunity to declare as investigated to the President, in view of the complaints and complaints formulated against it, ”says Ruiz Tobarra’s car, which has also ruled out raising a reasoned exhibition to the TSJ on the performance of the top leader of the Community.
This accusation also requested the consideration of investigated for the Government delegate, Pilar Bernabé, for not asking for the national emergency. The judge rules out the petition by considering that the protection of the civilian population, as marked by the Statute of Autonomy of the Valencian Community, is under the Autonomous Command: “The inactivity patent, connected to deaths and injuries on October 29, occurred in the regional sphere.”
-For the magistrate, the lack of subsequent assistance such as the devastation of the populations, the lack of essential resources, the delay in the aid, the problems on the roads and in the communications remains, the pillage, “it is a different issue.”
“The objective of this procedure is the analysis of the 227 deceased, one of them 8 months pregnant, a missing and the injured, the absence of decisions to safeguard the population and the regulations applicable to the case,” says the car.
The judge recalls that the national emergency was not declared state or requested from the autonomous administration -it remembers that the Single Command was in the hands of the then Department Salome Pradas. He even points out that there was consensus between both parties so as not to ask for the national emergency or October 29 or in later days. “The National Emergency Declaration was not accurate to alert the population and that self -protection measures were adopted.”