Lee: Final of the Libertadores in Lima: Entreelones of an election and what should happen to be played in the monumental
Néstor Gorosito. (Photo: GEC)
The most delicate case of the three expulsions of the night (Gorosito, Zambrano and Guerrero) is, without a doubt, that of the Argentine coach. Making a count, ‘Pipo’ had received a yellow card in the first minutes of the second half to claim the direct red that Bruno Pérez took to Paolo Guerrero for an alleged ‘chalaca’.
To the seconds of having made that decision, Pérez was called by the VAR to reconsider the expulsion of Guerrero. While the referee approached to review the play, Gorosito euphorically claimed that the player should not be expelled and signaled by pointing his head, perhaps appealing to Pérez’s “criterion”. This claim was not the pleasure of the main judge and taught him a yellow card.
Then, around minute 90, Carlos Zambrano committed a foul on Jimmy Valoyes that the referee considered a penalty cause. Given this, a trifulca was armed between ‘intimate’ players and the arbitration body, while, from its technical area, Néstor Gorosito showed his most impatient side and decided, among sarcastic laughs, withdraw from the field without any authorization.
The Argentine coach decided to walk through the center of the countryside and go to the locker room located under the East Tribune. Bruno Pérez was surprised, concluded that the coach was missing the rules and decided to show him a direct red. The expulsion was not enough, Gorosito continued walking a few signs to the main judge who were not his liking either.
As we could know, and for the background that is had as sanctions to coaches, The fact that Nestor Gorosito has received a yellow card and then a direct red would aggravate his situation more. Likewise, the signs, the angry claims and the fact of retiring from the field are also considered serious offenses to the arbitration body. In this regard, a sanction of eight, ten or even twelve dates to the coach in League 1, is estimated which would correspond to the remainder of the Opening Tournament (there are eight dates) and, in the worst case, part of the Clausura Tournament.
Paolo Guerrero was expelled for alleging Bruno Pérez. Relive the moment here. (Photo: Liga 1 Max)
The case of the two captains of Alianza Lima are not as complicated as that of the Argentine coach. In both cases they were two yellow cards that meant a red card and, beyond the angry claims of Paolo Guerrero after his expulsion, most likely they are sanctioned with a date as it usually happens.
However, in case it is considered that Guerrero committed some serious fault as aggression on the referee or other players, this sanction could be raised to two dates, but there is no clear record of it.
At the end of the game, Franco Navarro, sports director of Alianza Lima, entered the field to increpate Bruno Pérez. As could be seen in images, the leader tried to talk closely to the referee, but was held by the security of the ‘intimate’ club.
This behavior was cataloged by many as provocative against Pérez and that is why it could also be sanctioned by the Disciplinary Commission. In your case, you can try an economic fine to the club or to sanction the leader with some restrictions in League 1.
Meanwhile, the Alejandro Villanueva stadium, it is known that part of the delegate’s report has to do with some objects launched to Bruno Pérez at the end of the match from the stands and also, although to a lot of extent, to Christian Cueva, a footballer of Cienciano. Therefore, the stadium could be fined or, in case some serious action is checked, the partial or total closure of the stadium for some League 1 match.
*****
Win incredible awards with the subscription of the fan. Support your favorite team and live the cup passion as never before! Click here
Related news :