“We think it is a serious setback in terms of labor rights for all state workers.”. Thus he defined the Bariloche section of the ATE union to mark distance and a position totally contrary to that promoted by the central leadership of Río Negro and the provincial government.
In the negotiation table to prepare the Collective Bargaining Agreement (CCT) Only ATE Río Negro has been working, in the figure of its general secretary Rodrigo Vicente and other references, and the Province with legislator Lucas Pica in charge of carrying out the official proposal. But UPCN never showed up and insists on modifying the law and dealing with salaries.
The Government is determined to accelerate these talks and At the last meeting in May, it advanced with a block of 44 articleswith a date for a new meeting on June 10 where it plans to move forward with the issue of state labor licenses.
Among the points already agreed upon by ATE and the Government are the requirements for entry into the public administration, which will require a secondary degree, continuous training and periodic performance evaluations.
ATE Bariloche raised the flag against the progress made by the CCT that the leadership highlights as achievements, although it only blames Alberto’s government. Weretilneck who is blamed for being “in line with Javier Milei’s national policy.”
“With the signing of this supposed Collective Agreement The state employees are left, among other things, without job stability and is oriented towards profound discrimination between permanent and non-permanent agents.”warned the Andean section led by Patricia Reinahuel in a public statement in which they questioned the “provincial government that does not dialogue and shows permanent contempt for workers.”
For ATE Bariloche “progress is being made in the definancing and dismantling of free union organization of the workers” and in the articles under debate – which already has defined 44 of the 200 that it will have – “does not consider the vastly superior proposal in favor of public agents previously presented by the workers.”
For the sectionalWithout discussing or agreeing between parties there is no Collective Bargaining Agreement. Our section is not going to make you accomplices in handing over rights legitimately acquired through struggle and organization.”
In clear disagreement with the leadership of Vicente and Rodolfo Aguiar who was the promoter of this CCT, the people of Bariloche indicated that “until now there is no negotiation in good faith between the parties: the employer state and the party representing the workers, Therefore, even though the Government could administratively approve this CCT in complicity with the legislators, it will not have any legitimacy to later apply it,” they warned.
