Given the claim, Beatriz Morante, the substitute magistrate, summoned the parties to a conciliation session. The first meeting was held on May 21 with the author of the lawsuit and on June 6 with the defendant, indicates a recently published ruling. In that space, both had to raise their positions and the causes of their anger, in order to find a solution that satisfies both of them and that they reach a rapprochement that will allow them to live together in a harmonious climate from now on.
Allen Justice of the Peace
Allen’s substitute Justice of the Peace decided to expel the son-in-law from his mother-in-law’s house, who denounced him for being violent and being “the macho.”
Archive
The management was successful, because the parties managed to reach an agreement based on a proposal made by the mechanical establishment, consisting of establishing the operating hours from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. and from 4 p.m. to 8:30 p.m.
In that time frame you will be able to carry out your task without restrictions, but from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. you must honor your nap.
It was highlighted that the owner of the workshop stated that she was willing to “respect the rest hours that allow for good coexistence and cordial treatment with her neighbor.”
The offer was accepted by the claimant, so Morante decided to approve the arrangement.
The magistrate also urged residents to reflect “with a view to avoiding future conflicts.” But she also warned them about “the implications of the situations discussed within the framework of the hearing and the negative consequences for themselves, their emotional environment and society in general.”
Another case: they promised to live in peace
Allen’s substitute Justice of the Peace also intervened to settle the feud between two families who live in a housing plan.
Morante also brought together two women and obtained a commitment from both to get along. Within this framework, they reached an agreement to “maintain respectful treatment of each other and their respective families when they pass each other in the common spaces of the building.”
They also agreed to “maintain cleanliness and have a peaceful coexistence.”
Conflict over a dog
A woman got angry because her neighbor’s dog got into her yard. She also went to the Allen Peace Court and Morante managed to get them to approach positions to try for better coexistence.
The owner of the animal promised to “take all necessary preventive measures” so that his pet does not cross to the neighboring property, and to maintain “the condition of the dividing fence at all times.”
While the woman, upset by the presence of the dog, announced that she will place a set of pallets on the fence dividing both properties to reinforce the fence.
In addition, both parties agreed to build a wall of material and bricks in the future, dividing the expenses, although when economic circumstances allow it.
