“In December, when the new authorities took office, They questioned us about what our position was going to be, because the position was to block them and we asked ourselves why. “At the time the DNU entered, I was the first in the entire country to take a stand against it,” he said.
Kueider assured that “he wanted the DNU was rejected” and that thanks to “his strategy” and saying “publicly” that the DNU “as it was was unconstitutional” he managed to have the project modified.
“We cannot get into the idea that ‘if we don’t govern, we’ll set everything on fire.’ We cannot constantly be in the position of not letting govern. With that logic, Peronism reached this point of resounding crisis,” he said.
When asked about the expressions of several Peronist senators (Frente de Todos/Unión por la Patria) about calling “traitors” those who voted in favor of the Bases Law, the official stated that he was not and that if someone “betrayed and “destroyed” the party was “Alberto and his shootout with Cristina.”
“If you ask who leads Peronism today, people give you different answers. Alberto had the opportunity to rebuild it and he didn’t, he stayed in the middle. Furthermore, he left me in writing that he was going to solve the energy issue in Entre Ríos and then he blocked my phone. “I don’t know if it makes me happy or sad,” he said.
The senators who voted affirmatively on the project sent by the Executive make up a minority within Peronism and, for this reason, the majority percentage put on the table the discussion about whether or not they should disassociate them. When asked about this issue, Kueider maintained that he “does not know what they are going to do” he only stated that “they are going to have a nice debate within Peronism” and that they will see “who is the Homeland and who are the traitors.”
“One of the main axes of delivering the country is with the RIGI (Incentive Regime for Large Investments) and I voted against. In Unión por la Patria, some voted in favor and, therefore, it was not rejected Am I, who voted against, a traitor to the country?“he questioned.
Likewise, he stressed that his vote was “again decided” and that “many people congratulated him” because, although he thinks “different from this Government”, as a senator of the Nation “he cannot prevent the development” of a democratically elected administration.
“We had to recover what we had lost: the debate between parties for the modification of what we believe is wrong. It is not a yes or a no. There is a little federal agenda in a totally unitary country. We must put that in the debate “, he synthesized.
Finally, Kueider stressed that “You have to read why people voted for Milei”despite having said “everything he said he was going to do” during the campaign.
Fountain: Argentine News
NULL
