In the last hours, Laudelina Peñathe aunt of Loan, gave a key statement that changed the course of the case investigating the whereabouts of the minor who disappeared more than 15 days ago in the province of Corrientes: he confessed that The child is dead and was allegedly run over by the ship captain (RE) Carlos Pérez and his partner, Victoria Caillava. However, She filed her complaint in the Corrientes Court and not before the federal prosecutor, who is pursuing the case.
The explanation for this peculiarity has to do with the context in which the woman agreed to speak. According to her environment, it was necessary to create an environment of extreme trust so that she, accompanied by her lawyer José Codazzi, could express what she had to say.
The woman arrived in a gray car to Corrientes to appear before the provincial prosecutor’s office and tell his version of what happened on June 13, when the minor was last seen during lunch at his grandmother Catalina’s house.
According to sources of the case, the fiscal department that he attended has the obligation to receive the complaint and cannot refuse to do so even if the case has an open cause in federal court. For this reason, Laudelina was treated by Gustavo Robineauhead of UFI 6, who was on duty, a period in which he is also in charge of the Fiscal Unit for Reception and Analysis of Cases.
In this way, during the early morning, the process began in which Loan’s aunt began to give her statement. She did it at three in the morning, it took half an hour and finished around 5 am. During that time, The woman recounted what she saw and detailed at what moments she took part in the episode. When he finished, he left with his legal representative. She was not detained beyond having admitted that he covered up the incident and that he helped plant a false trail to divert the searches.
Laudelina’s sayings now were referred to federal justice who was handling the case, who must confirm what she said, questioning the minor’s aunt again – as a witness or as the accused – and also corroborate her version with physical evidence. Then you will have to decide in which jurisdiction the case continues: if, as the version circulating today says, it was an accident, the case should return to the provincial jurisdiction because it would be an ordinary crime.
If the version of the accident is confirmed, a removing traces from the vehicle in question could provide proof of the impact that took Loan’s life: there should be a trace of blood or any tissue, or a mark detectable with reagent tests.
In the list of more than 50 pieces of evidence that the Corrientes Public Prosecutor’s Office sent to the federal Justice Department, there is no forensic analysis of the cars of Carlos Pérez and his wife, only a dog tracking that indicated that Loan was there. In this sense, federal Justice sources assured Infobae that there was a removal of traces between the tests, but they did not specify if they were made in the cars of the accused couple.
This afternoon the Provincial leader, Gustavo Valdés, He announced in his X account that an important step had been taken in the resolution of the Loan case and, in a second publication, he referred to the statement given by Loan’s aunt in the last few hours. “Laudelina testified both before the Attorney General’s Office and before the Provincial Prosecutor’s Office of Corrientes, and she would have narrated what the events of the Loan Case were like. All actions taken are being submitted to the Federal Court. so that it proceeds in accordance with the law,” the governor posted without giving further details on the matter.
