9 MAYO 2025
In line with what I held in my last column fifteen days ago, I want to return to this that the right can even there. If you remember, I put your eye on the cover -up of the true purposes of that heart, as you paint a friend of mine to those 17 lawyers who approved the purchase of Allende’s house. Becoming the chiflados, or that they did not know that there were constitutional disabilities of the senator wrapped, even if that would show that an incompetent lot advises the presidency of the Republic. All in order to check the right and the constitution in which they do not believe. Now, on the same day that I would raise this thesis, a filtration came out in this newspaper, loading the inks again in Isabel Allende, the situation changes in no way. She serves as a scapegoat. Saving the president can even take the devotion to the “Allende’s legacy”, and even opponents of the government can get into the car. To the presidency you have to “protect her” anyway.
It is not uncommon to occur to me this series of propositions while I finished reading London Street 38. Two cases of impunity: Pinochet in England and a Nazi in the Patagonia of Philippe Sands. strong, documented and entertaining. He enters between racks to find what was behind Pinochet’s return, and competently implies that there was arrangement between Straw and the Frei government. Rauff in Punta Arenas serves to accentuate that in Chile impunity comes from a long time and is transversal. He quotes the environment of Pinochet and the British in which retrospective looks with more relief that you reserve again. And Sands is a lawyer, a law professor, participated in the trial, but his books denounce the limitations of law. A real problem that only few jurists grant even when it is evident. The law reaches to some extent and the remaining is in the hands of the Treatments of Executive Government Powers.
Those who affirm that there is no right that there is no right is right. The right every time it offers aporia without a driving solution to the impunity of anything serves. Philosophy usually falls into contradictions, but the right has practical consequences so that theirs can be more serious. And this is where the struggle for power is used. Of course, powers in dispute no matter how much they face, arrive a point, grant and agree to leave it there. It was then that “humanitarian reasons” and “senility” in the Pinochet case led to impunity as a solution. The worst crime, if one thinks, that comes to commit justice, in this case of two states, the United Kingdom and Chile, with the relief of Spain as a blessing. As compensation at least we won a great historian in Sands.
By Alfredo Jocelynhistorian
NEWSLETTER
When you subscribe you are accepting the Terms and conditions and the Privacy policies of the third.
Related news :