The head of the Court of first Instance and Instruction 3 of Catarroj Utielto Algemesíto the Chief of Climatology of the AEMET in the Valencian Community and three workers of the Hydrographic Confederation of Júcar (CHJ).
In the first of the cars, the magistrate inadmises the exercise of the criminal action against the mayor of Utiel requested in a complaint by the daughters of a deceased. Considers the judge that there is a “radical difference between the Local and Autonomous Administration in order to launch alerts to the population and the adoption of self -protection measures ”.
In this sense, “the fragmentary analysis of the information available, not only by said City Council, but in general by all of them, unlike those who legally assumed the emergency command in the Autonomous administrationwho had multiple information channels (…), prevents attributing the position of guarantor, not only to the mayor of Utiel, but the rest of the mayors, who were surprised, did not receive the precise information or specifically advised to adopt the measures to be adopted, ”says the Instructor.
That is why he concludes that the “indiscriminate” attribution of criminal responsibility in deaths to any public authority or official, and especially from the local authorities “must be discarded flat.” On the contrary, the judge does agree that This mayor declares as witness.
In a providence, the magistrate has also agreed to receive a statement, also as witnesses, to the mayor of Algemesí and three officials of the CHJas a popular accusation that the individual also exercises in the name of a injured person had requested in a brief.
On the other hand, in a second car, it denies various research proceedings requested by another popular accusation, with the exception of citing as a witness to the Chief of Aemet Climatology In the Valencian Community.
He Third car notified today denies the request of a particular accusation to be released to the Department National Security to provide all the reports that said body could have issued on October 29, 2024, considering it “an unnecessary diligence” in the instruction of this cause.
In it Fourth Autothe judge dismisses the appeal filed by a popular accusation against the decision of the Court to deny their request to identify official vehicles used between October 29 and 30 last year by the president of the Generalitat and his escorts, as well as by the two investigated in the case (former justice and internal secretary of emergency secretary).
Finally, the fifth car denies the request for a particular accusation that sought that the Court proposed to the Institute of Legal Medicine (IML) of Valencia that determines among the psychic sequelae the possible existence of concrete pathologies, without prejudice to the medical documentation that the applicants want to contribute.
The Magistrate Remember that IML experts are already doing “an exhaustive and weighted examination of the sufferings or pathologies of people under examination.”
It also rejects in this resolution obtaining emergency calls made to the National Police, Civil Guard and Local Policeas well as the realization of an expert report on the “alleged falsehood” of a photograph in which the president of the Generalitat appears entering on October 29 in the Cecopi, in this case because the court has no competence with respect to said analysis because the image has not been contributed in the procedure.
