The possibility that Congress censure al primer Gustavo Adrianzén He took a new impulse on Wednesday, after a fourth motion of censure against him was presented. There are already 58 legislators who have signed one or more motions against Adrianzén after MINING WORKERS KILLINGS In the province of Pataz, La Libertad.
The signatories belong to 10 parliamentary banks. These are Podemos, Peru Libre, Popular Action, Popular Renewal, Avanza País, Socialist Banking, together for Peru – Voices of the People, Honor and Democracy, Democratic Block and Magisterial Block. They are added unattered legislators.
Only the Popular Force congressmen, Alliance for progress (app) and we are Peru have not signed any motion. Previous acts show that Fujimori and app provides political support to the government of President Dina Boluarte.
To censor the prime minister, at least 66 votes are required in the Plenary of Congress.
The congressmen who have signed the motions belong to parliamentary groups that together add 82 votes. In addition, if they are added the six unattered six, the figure would reach 88.
This is the projection of votes based on censorship motions:
| BENCH | N ° of members | N ° of signatories |
|---|---|---|
| We can Peru | 14 | 11 |
| Free Peru | 11 | 2 |
| Popular renewal | 11 | 11 |
| Popular Action | 9 | 9 |
| Magisterial Block | 8 | 2 |
| Together with Peru – Voices of the People | 8 | 6 |
| Country progress | 6 | 2 |
| Socialist bench | 5 | 4 |
| Democratic block | 5 | 5 |
| Honor and democracy | 5 | 1 |
| Not grouped | 6 | 5 |
| TOTAL | 88 | 58 |
However, reality is more complex. It is unlikely that all benches vote in block. It is also about to be seen if in the next few days some congressmen begin to withdraw their signatures from the motions.
As the trade has realized, in the last two years, 50 congressmen withdrew their signatures a total of 106 times in 33 interpellation, censorship and vacancy motions. This common practice in the current congress is used as a strategy to stop or hinder the progress of these initiatives.
The legislator Ruth Luque (Democratic block) referred to it in dialogue with The trade. “Censorship are achieved if the members of Bancadas such as Peru Libre, Podemos, Podemos, renewal, together for Peru and Popular Action do not go back. In my parliamentary experience I have seen that there are congressmen who withdraw their signature, do not vote or change positions”said.
Meanwhile, the legislator Edward Málaga (not grouped) specified another key point: “Sign [las mociones] It does not amount to vote [por la censura]”.
The spokesman for Peru Libre, Flavio Cruzconfirmed this, because although he has signed the four motions, he said that “at the time” his block will decide whether he finally supports or rejects the censorship of Adrianzén.
Cruz said that the legislators of Peru Libre “have freedom” to sign or not the motions. But then, when the topic will finally be discussed in the plenary, they will meet to adopt a position.
For his part, the spokesman for together for Peru – voices of the people, Roberto Sánchezgave a more optimistic response in dialogue with this newspaper: “The political forces of Parliament have the zero hour. Do we censor it or arm it? We will censor it, there are 66 votes,” he said.
Sánchez said that “the massacre of 13 Peruvians in Pataz could be avoided, that was in the hands of the prime minister, who by denying the incident, politically retracted the actions of the government.”
That in reference to the fact that, last Saturday, May 26, Adrianzén I doubt the veracity of the kidnapping of the mining workers, whose remains were found the next day, tied and with bullet impacts.
For its part, the third vice president of Congress, Alejandro Cavero (Country progress), did not sign any motion, but said that Parliament must proceed with censorship.
“I have said on several occasions that Mr. Adrianzén has to step aside. Personally, I think this congress should proceed with censorship. The case of Pataz is the drop that spilled the glass,” he said in dialogue with Channel N.
Cavero said that his bench is not yet gathered to fix a posture. When this happens – he said – he will defend his position in favor of the change of the prime minister.
The uncertainty of the final vote will remain over the next few days and even when the issue is evaluated in the Plenary of Congress. There, critical speeches against the Executive would be heard mostly, but at the decisive moment of the vote, it is also possible that the positions against censorship will be imposed.
It has become a common practice that congressmen have a red speech, but a green vote.
According to the Congress regulations, the censorship motions must be debated and voted between the fourth and the tenth natural day after its presentation. Therefore, the plenary would address this issue next week.
Although the four motions presented exceeded the minimum of 33 firms required, the proposal promoted by congressmen Edward Malaga and Roberto Sánchez faced obstacles in the validation process. Malaga indicated a The trade That advisors to different parliamentary offices are working to correct errors and re -present the initiative formally.
Last Tuesday the motions promoted by the benches of Podemos Peru and Popular Action were presented; And on Wednesday the popular renewal was added.
In the event that Congress approves censorship against Prime Minister Gustavo Adrianzén, he must present his resignation and the president On Biguarte It will be obliged to accept it within a maximum period of 72 hours.
Being the head of the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, its departure would imply a total crisis of the cabinet, that is, all ministers would have to resign. However, the head of the State has the power to ratify the same officials if it considers it convenient.
Adrianzén is the third head of the Ministerial Cabinet so far in Boluarte’s management. The first was Pedro Angulo, who lasted only 11 days in office. The second was Alberto Otárola, now distanced from Boluarte.
Recommended video:
