They ensure that the mercantile that has an agreement for the purchase of the club asked to postpone the payment of the last term with the Treasury, when questioning the debt of 2 million derived from a dispute lost by the LFP or G-30. As for the sale, there is only a verbal agreement conditioned to the category and that would not be signed while the judicial obstacles proposed by Pablo Comas persist.
Although the generalized perception indicates that the sale of the recreational of Huelva is not made, the reality is different. Gildoy Spain has not yet come its actions. Thus, from COPE HUELVA They have reported that what exists is a verbal agreement and a price depending on the category in which the club is, once the season ends.
Although it is not yet made The operation, with its corresponding signature before a notary, at the moment does not danger. But it is true that It is still a stumbling block the judicial claims of Pablo Comas with respect to political agents and ancient components of the Administration Councils. On the horizon, claim in some way The withdrawal of the club in the ‘Stadium Case’.
So things, The sale is not made, but it does not jeople if Pablo Comas accepts the rules of the gameas indicated in Cope Huelva, while the new Board of Directors, composed of Adrián Fernández-Romero and Simón Onrubia on behalf of TS Capital Partners SL, and Antonio Carrasco by Huelva Deporte, are not ratified by its current owner, Gildoy Spain SL. This is reflected in the Mercantile Registry.
As for the famous last term of the singular agreement with the Treasury, the aforementioned station explained what we already knew. That increase in the last quota, which went from an amount of about 500,000 euros to about 2 million. And all for a lawsuit, which we already inform exclusively in Albiazules.es. A sentence of the National Court, after a claim from the AEAT to the LFP, which ended up increasing debt for the amounts that were derived by solidarity liability to the Professional Soccer League or G-30.
-It should be noted that the current owner, Pablo Comas, considers that this debt does not belong to him and he has let it know Ts Capital Partners. That would be The explanation, as the journalist Elías Luis Grao de Deportes Cope Huelva has revealed, for which the current managers have not faced the payment on April 30given that They would be studying the case and that is why they would have requested the Finance for the postponement and fractionation of said debt.
The aforementioned medium asserts that “They have to study whether or not they correspond to that payment” and that it has been done by the club and the previous ones responsible at the administrative level to avoid this award of debt. Hence they have requested the postponement. As for the subdivision, it would be the most relieved way to face the payment, if it finally corresponds to it. Club managers also reiterate that money is available and will assume a possible surcharge In case it corresponds to pay that debt.
It does not seem that this claim can have a journeysince it is a litigation between the Treasury and LaLiga, and in which the club had to assume the sentence, that is, the increase in debt without any possibility of avoiding it.
Copyright 2009-2025 albiazules.es. Photographs of Manu López, reuse is not allowed.
