The Buenos Aires Federal Chamber rejected a complaint by prosecutor Carlos Rívolo And he endorsed the decision of Judge María Eugenia Capuchetti to resume the investigation of the residual cause of the attempted attempt against former President Cristina Kirchner of 2022 and focus on irregularities of the Federal Police after the frustrated attack.
Chamber I of that court, composed of judges Mariano Llorens, Pablo Bertuzzi and Leopoldo Bruglia, confirmed this week that the power to delegate a judicial investigation, as Capuchetti had done with Rívolo, ““It is a discretionary faculty of the judge. ”
Meanwhile, Pro Gerardo Milman’s deputy He asked for the investigation of the employee of the Block of Deputies of the Front for Victory, Jorge Abellowho falsely accused him of having said before September 1, 2022 that when the attack was completed he would be traveling to the coast. He did it in another case that federal judge has Julián Ercolini.
In tune with the defense of Cristina, the former director of Contrainteligencia de la Side and deputy K Rodolfo Tailhade promoted a summary against Capucetti in the Council of the Magistracy for not accepting to depart from the cause as the defense of the former vice president wants.
All in parallelto the oral trial that takes place against Fernando Sabag Montiel, Brenda Uliarte and Nicolás Carrizo as authors and accomplices of the attempt to murder of the former president.
Rívolo had elevated a complaint appeal last month for the decision of the magistrate to reject her appeal against the decision to resume the instruction of these actions.
The prosecutor had claimed that “the temperament was not only arbitrary, but caused an irreparable lien“He said that” the decision adopted was untimely, since since November 2022, the investigation was in charge, within the framework of which he made multiple probative proceedings. “
The prosecutor questioned that, by resuming the investigation, the judge ordered as a measure to deliver a trade to the Attorney General’s Office (PIA), in order to request the referral of A summary regarding irregularities of Federal Police troops in the investigation.
Instead, the judge argued that “the specific lien that the decision caused the appellant had not been demonstrated in front of a investigation that in recent times, in his opinion, in his opinion, had not evidenced significant advances”.
Then, the Chamber recalled that he said “in various precedents that the Delegation Institute It is eminently discretionary to the judgebeing able to have its use throughout the instruction. ”And he gave the judge right on this pug.
These days, the judge asked the Minister of Security, Patricia Bullrich, a report specified by the “All officials, employees and/or members of said portfoliothat they focused on operational and/or administrative tasks linked and subsequent “to the frustrated attack of the former president.
The strain In the case it was confirmed when Cristina’s lawyers wanted to throw those of Milman and the judge rejected him.
In parallel, Milman asked for the investigative of the advisor to the K block, Jorge Alberto Abello, for the crime of false aggravated testimony. Abello’s statement motivated Milman in the main cause.
The pro legislator recalled that Abello’s brother -in -law, Sebastián Enrique Rende, who accompanied him to have coffee at the Casablanca bar, located behind the congress, He denied having heard Milman say that phrase about the attack.
Rende said he had already been in the bar and the same distance from the table of Milman and his two secretaries and that “he did not listen to such a phrase” and that his brother -in -law did not tell him anything about Milman. Moreover, he said that “We talked more about the girls who accompanied him, who were young, than him”. The advisors of Milman Ivana Bohdziewicz and Carolina Gomez Monaco were “clear and forceful by stating not having listened to Milman to say the phrase attributed by Abello,” said Milman’s lawyers.
In an expert at the K -cell phone, it was verified that “It doesn’t exist” A message from Abello to Deputy K Ricardo Cerici, alerting him about the alleged compromising phrase.
The judge stayed with the cause after Clarion He published exclusively a video that reveals how on September 4, 2022 Federal Police troops let Brenda Uliarte escape a house where she was hidden in Barracas, two days after her boyfriend Fernando Sabag Montiel tried to kill former President Cristina Kirchner.
The video taken by a CABA security camera shows when that night, at 21, Brenda – a man of a man – leaves a building located on Montes de Oca 1209 Avenue in front of two agents of the General Directorate of Intelligence of the Federal Police who surprisingly do not stop it, despite the fact that Judge Capuchetti had fought in the morning its arrest order. The agents set guard in the place for several hours.
However, the Directorate of Judicial Assistance in Complex Crimes and Organized Crime (Dajudeco) geolocalized the Ulaiarte cell phone that moved from Barracas and headed to Luna Park with alleged destination retirement.
Before the inaction of the Federal Police of the Government of Alberto Fernández, the judge, a secretary and his custodian went to the retirement station and did not find it.
Then they recalled that the accused lived in the Buenos Aires town of San Miguel, they went to the Palermo del Rerrocarril San Martín station where the judge ordered to stop the train and a federal officer – incorporated to the group – identified it and stopped it.
Related news :