Written in TELEVISION he 6/16/2024 · 11:11 a.m.
Fernando Burlando He was one of the guests on the last program Mirtha Legrand, sharing the table with the journalists Mariana Brey and Franco Mercuriali, as well as the actor Arnaldo André. During the conversation, the topic of the sentencing of Juan Darthés. Burlando confirmed that the actor was sentenced to six years in prison. “Yes, but it’s still missing,” he said. “There is a long way to go. There is still an appeal that is in the same instance, where two more judges intervene. All this happens in Brazil. Our study does not intervene,” he clarified.
To make it clear that the sentence is not final, the lawyer explained that there are still two instances: one in the superior court of São Paulo and another in the Constitutional Court. “It’s still missing,” he stressed. He then mentioned that he maintains direct communication with the actor and that his studio recommended that he leave the country. “We advised him that in Brazil he would find a less influenced justice system,” he explained.
When asked about his work for the actor, Fernando Burlando He clarified that he did not participate in the trial in Brazil. “Initially I defended Juan,” she said. “Then you abandoned him?”Legrand asked. “No, I did not abandon him. Normally I do not abandon anyone. I was present in several proceedings prior to the oral trial sentence. There I was present in some proceedings and he was acquitted. Now, all the appeals are processed in Brazil, and we cannot “we intervene”, he explained. “Actually, I could revalidate my title there,” she added.
After explaining why she recommended that Darthés not appear before the Nicaraguan Justice and settle in Brazil – “we believed that there are the worst prisons in the world,” she clarified – Burlando faced one of the diva’s most direct questions. “Was it rape?”The driver asked bluntly. “Well, the Court is now talking about statutory rape,” the lawyer responded. “He says he was consensual,” he insisted. Mirtha Legrand. “I don’t know what Juan is saying,” Burlando responded with a half smile. “Didn’t he read it?” Mirtha asked, surprised. “No. I saw something else. That’s why I say it. Other issues arose in the trial. Obviously, I have a duty of confidentiality, and I know how far I can speak. But what these two new judges are saying now is about a situation of statutory rape, that has nothing to do with aggravated sexual abuse, as was intended,” he concluded.
