The low camera It was the scene of intense discussions this week prior to the treatment in the premises of the Bases Law. From requests for modifications to apologies for absences, the debate was marked by tensions between the different blocks.
This week in the Lower House there were hours of tension when Pichetto asked to remove articles that complicated the unions. The UCR It was planted with the labor reform and there were even requests not to pass the libertarian chainsaw through two organizations in the area of Culture.
The anger of the PRO block, which He withdrew from the discussion for several hours when he saw that La Libertad Avanza had not advanced with the consensus. The details of a heated discussion.
The president of the Lower House, Martín Menemhad to apologize for his absence at the beginning of a crucial meeting, which sparked the discomfort of some deputies. The intervention of Miguel Ángel Pichetto, requesting the elimination of an article of the labor reform, generated a first high point in the discussion.
At the beginning of the match, the block led by Miguel Ángel Pichetto kicked off. Oscar Agost Carreño and Nicolás Massot from Córdoba were there on Zoom. “We are not going to follow the law if article 98 is not removed”said.
That draft article that The Executive sent to Deputies established sentences of six months to three years in prison for those who block companies. The other deputies interrupted him: “But isn’t that just Pichetto’s position?”
«No, it is that of the entire block»Agost Carreño responded. Close to him was, in silence, Juan Manuel López, from the Civic Coalition, one of the three legs of the bench.
At that moment it was proposed to call Pichetto to appear at the meeting. “I’m finishing a meal,” he said. He was having lunch. He appeared a while later. The radicals, led by Karina Banfi – vice president of the bloc – and Pamela Verasay from Mendoza, were enraged.: They asked to be taken into account regarding a labor reform project that they had presented two weeks ago.
Pressure from various political sectors led to the reopening of the debate on issues such as profits and issues linked to culture, evidencing the cracks within the blocks.. The anger of the PRO, who temporarily withdrew from the discussion, and the need for a more orderly call by Menem marked the day.
Finally, after intense negotiations, a precarious agreement was reached to bring the Bases law to the venue next Monday. However, Doubts persist about the viability of some issues discussed, which could open a new chapter of uncertainty in the legislative debate.
With profile information
