There is a warning that in the last hours emerged from the fine reading of the opinion of the draft of the Bases Law that will be voted on in Congress today, Monday the 29th. It was made by the former national deputy Marisa Uceda (Peronist), lawyer specializing in pension cases. Clearing up partisan political prejudices and avoiding unnecessary chicanery, it is reasonable to pay attention to this observation of pension policy and technique.
That is why we transcribe verbatim so that the proposal can be understood first-hand and in this way we contribute to the better knowledge of our ten representatives in the Chamber of Deputies. That is, Julio Cobos, Lisandro Nieri, and Pamela Verasay from the UCR; Mercedes Llano, Facundo Correa Llano, Lourdes Arrieta and lvaro Martínez from LLA; and Adolfo Bermejo, Liliana Paponet and Martín Aveiro of Peronism.
The debate will begin at 12:00 today and this is what Uceda said early in the program #6a7 day (Monday to Friday from 6 to 7, Radio Jornada 91.9; 101.1 in the East and 96.9 in Lujn de Cuyo).
See: Point by point, the reforms to be discussed today Deputies
Without purchasing power for retirement debt. What we observe is that article 274 of the Bases law, which repeals the pension debt payment plan, leaves helpless a large group of women and men, especially women, who without these facilities will not be able to access the benefit. pension, because on the one hand, once they reach retirement age without reaching 30 years of contributions, they will not be able to “buy” those contributions after retirement age in order to be considered retired.
Proportional withdrawal. The big problem is that they institute a new benefit that in reality is still the PUAM (Universal Benefit for the Elderly) that was instituted in 2016, now with another name called “proportional retirement”, which has the same amount of benefits. the PUAM which is 80 percent of a minimum retirement and which The requirement to be able to access it is to be 65 years of age..
The president of the Lower House of the Nation, Martín Menem.
ANSES collection is lost. The repeal also implies a measure that was novel and that contributes to financing the provisional system, which was early cancellation, which was the benefit for people who, 10 years before their retirement age, could begin to pay that provisional debt and thus reach at the time of the required age, for both men and women, without debt, financing the system in some way because it receives a double contribution from the same active worker.
Women’s retirement limbo. The big drawback is that women retire at 60 years old, that is, if they are hired by our employers we will be left out of the system, because at 60 years old they will not be obliged to continue supporting us as registered workers and they will throw us out. to a desolate future where there will be no provisional system that will accommodate us until we are 65 years old. The issue becomes more complicated when we can see that out of every 10 women only one achieves 30 years of contribution. So the situation is very serious.
Marisa Uceda former national representative
To complete this overview of the ANSES records, it is confirmed that In Mendoza about 10 thousand people retire per year and of which 6 thousand are women.
According to the arguments of the feminist sectors that will protest this situation, they provide statistical data. Only 10 percent of women manage to retire with 30 years of retirement contributions.
