Reader Enríquez proposes in his letter today “Rename the CCK, but with a deep republican sense”, which “if it were decided to change his name, it should be that of someone whose artistic excellence be a letter of presentation for our country.”
It was not a proposal or suggestion from Cristina when imposed that of Néstor Kirchner for the Bicentennial Cultural Center, where the Palace of Post Office and Communications operated. It was in November 2012, two years after the death of her husband, when then-president Cristina made sure that her followers sanctioned Law 26,794. And, as if that were not enough, she planted the bronze statue of Néstor Kirchner as a welcome mat in the entrance hall to the CCK, in question today.
In May, the Government announced that switch to by decree the name of that cultural center and marking ground it will be called Freedom Palace. Although it must be renamed for a political and social issue, the reason for the Decree of Necessity and Urgency is not understood. However, Milei, with suspicious speed, will do it in the best K style, imposing ideas instead of debating them.
To deactivate the stories, a popular consultation or a bill modifying the 2012 law would not hurt, but analyzing it with parity of political voices. Not in one fell swoop. What is the concept of freedom that they promote by forcing something that should come about simply by consensus? What happened to the freedom to choose?
I understand that space-time in politics is limited, changes are urgent because It is no longer patience but the hunger that lurksbut the Bicentennial Cultural Center It is not a militant bunker. Get it out of your head. Cultural battles are won in the streets.
While priorities overflow the agenda, they still continue with that mystical mania of labeling what belongs to everyone with ideologies of a few.
