Before Rich’s fateful night, there were several incidents in clubs: one on the night before the election, when Prohibition came into effect, in a business located in Pedro Moreno.
????
Then, two previous brawls outside establishments that continued operating at hours well beyond the permitted hours. One in the center and another in the Himalayan area.
????
These situations reflect that the municipal and state agencies in charge of monitoring compliance with regulations regarding the operation of bars and clubs have failed disastrously.
????
In the city council and in the state government they made a chilling admission: they knew that there were irregularities and failures, that a more thorough authority would have followed up on them, but they did nothing.
????
At the city hall, they indicated that they had not received a request for authorization of the ill-fated concert that generated the tragedy, so there was no possibility of carrying out a security review. Oh really?
????
The Rich is a popular place among young people and the concert had significant coverage on the bar’s Instagram account, now deleted. Don’t the mayor’s office monitor these types of advertisements? Does a municipal government that presumes to be proactive only really act when it has a request in front of it?
????
And in the state government, a site inspection carried out in March detected unsafe situations in the bar facilities, Civil Protection recommended they be resolved before granting authorization. And he forgot about it.
????
There were no subsequent verifications nor was it confirmed that the joint was no longer operating.
????
Precisely in March, a review appeared on Google in the opinions section about the nightclub’s service that also anticipated disaster: “A nightclub with terrible attention from the security personnel, minors at all costs, drunk, but they “they champion acts of illegality.”
????
If the Rich admitted minors and dared to call an event that had a response that exceeded them, without daring to cancel for the sake of business, it was because the authorities at both levels failed to fulfill their responsibility.
????
The case of the Labor Party, which nominated as a candidate an elderly woman who was not informed of the procedure, is a variation of an authority that does not fulfill its task 100 percent.
????
Didn’t Ceepac even verify the address that the party presented as its headquarters? The fact that it is actually a commercial address increases the bad feeling against that party.
????
SEE YOU TOMORROW!
