In one of the recent emissions of the cycle of Mirtha Legrand in The thirteen He exposed a ignition debate that ended up monopolizing all the attention. On this occasion, Pablo Echarri and Diego Sehinkman, TN journalist starred in an exchange on the political situation of the country that ended up raising the tone of the talk.
during the conversation, Echarri made reference to the incidents that occur near the national Congress on Wednesdays: «Do you say that repression of retirees is not to hit 15 old? I remember the stone dump trucks for that. Around the Congress, trucks with stones, it seems, ”he said, remembering the episodes of violence in demonstrations.
Given that statement, Sehinkman launched a criticism that further turned on the discussion: “Your thing is also militancy,” he told, without filters, the actor. It was at that moment that Mirtha Legrand He decided to put a brake on the strong crossing and, with his usual temper, he interrupted the conversation: «Wait wait, they will never agree. We end with this topic, we will never agree ».
-Echarri did not keep anything about the economic situation
Without lowering the intensity, Pablo Echarri pointed directly against the national government and external debt: «The release with a debt take of 20 million dollars with the fund and with a decalogue of what Argentina should do. In exchange for what this was? ”The actor questioned, pointing out his rejection of the agreement reached with the IMF during the current management of Javier Milei.
Firmly, Echarri continued to expose his position in front of everyone: “I am against the interference of the Monetary Fund because it comes with a number of measures that avoid the development of a country. That money, first, use it to pay the debt.” In addition, he pointed directly against the previous administration: “What Macri asked, almost entirely, to finance the money away from money. Half inks.
A Mirtha question that turned on the table
When the tension seemed not to decrease, Mirtha Legrand He surprised with a consultation that he left everyone thinking: “Why do they pamper him so much?” He asked in allusion to the government’s relationship with certain economic sectors. In turn, Pablo Sehinkman added: “Because there is ideological tune with Trump.” I don’t know if people can wait, “he replied, reflecting the contrast of opinions that marked the night.
