Undoubtedly, arbitral decisions continue to put different clubs at risk to meet the objectives in this Liga BetPlay 2025-I. Since the first date, there have been great controversies that leave the arbitration lists and lose credibility.
From the Arbitration Commission There has not been a concrete response about arbitration errors that have been repeated week after week in the Betplay League. On date 17, there was controversy in the first meeting and in the last one where equity and Envigado They were ‘punished’ and that meant triumphs of Valledupar Alianza and Boyacá Chicó.
See also: Millionaires announced reinforcement for the second semester of 2025
In the case of the Antioqueños, a hand on the last second was indicated as a penalty that Chicó turned. While the ball impacts the arm of the Envigado defender, paste after a bounce in the knee. And in the case of equity, there was great confusion in the validation of the second aliancist goal.
So much was the confusion that equity responded on Tuesday with a letter demanding several things to the Dimayor to avoid these actions and to demonstrate the disagreement with the referees.
The request for equity to the Dimayor after arbitration error
Alliance took the points as a visitor with a controversial goal that went up to the score in the midst of several errors of the referee, Diego Ulloa. An unprecedented mistake for the signaling of the central game, then, the judge validated the goal of Jesús Muñoz After several reviews that changed the initial decisions.
-About 70 minutes, Jesús Muñoz scored goal after Fabián Orozcoparty line will point out. Diego Ulloa confirmed the first decision to cancel the goal and when the indirect free kick was going to be charged, Ulloa was called VAR to review the play.
The central judge waited for the call and while talking with those of the VAR, the defenders of Equity took the ball to execute the free kick. At that time, he changed the decision and validated the goal for what they told him in technology.
It may interest you: Medellín suffers serious problem for Betplay League home runs
However, he did not resume the game and had to go to the monitor to review the action of that goal. While it was valid from the first moment, the confusion of the VAR questioned the continuity of the commitment. Diego Ulloa came to see the action and ratified the decision to give the goal as legal. The play was checked several times when the scorer left well.
Equity players approached Diego Ulloa for confusion and rejected that decision for the number of times the play was reviewed. Given this situation, Mariano Olsen He informed that, “Equity sent a letter to the Dimayor requesting the audios of the VAR and the suspension for referee Diego Ulloa and the arbitral body after the serious procedure error which was generated in the second goal to Alianza Valledupar FC at minute 70 ”.
In that order of ideas, the Dimayor must bring to light the audios to put an end to the confusion of these signaling by Diego Ulloa that arbitrated the commitment and waiting from the insurance picture to be suspended.
