Armenia
Last In the month of March, in the midst of the controversy, the draft agreement was approved on March 3, 2024. for the concession of some of the services of the city’s Transit Secretariat, which includes the photodetection cameras.
Despite the above The agreement was transferred to the departmental government for the respective analysis and that is where, as a result of inconsistencies, he was transferred to the Administrative Court of Quindío.
On the subject, the legal secretaryide of the governor of the department, Juan Carlos Alfaro explained that It has nothing to do with political issues, but rather it falls within the legality and constitutionality required by the corresponding regulations.
You may be interested in:
“It is not about the extraordinary or exceptional review of an agreement of the municipality of Armenia, but rather legal and constitutional provision, governors have the obligation to review the agreements of the different Municipal CouncilsThat is to say, it is a review that is carried out on all the agreements of all the municipalities”, He maintained.
He specified that They must review all municipal agreements, which is why to date they have 48 where 40 of them were without any observation. and 8 referred to the court, among which is the present SETTA project.
He highlighted that on the eight municipal agreements that were sent to the Court four of them are in process of admission, the others one was validated without accepting the arguments presented by the departmental government and three others have considered them invalid.
WHAT DID THEY FIND IN THE ANALYSIS?
He specified that After the analysis they found situations related to the authorization support studies of the concession that verifies the viability. He also pointed out that they showed inconsistencies in the title that talks about the concession of services, but in the operative part it specifies some services which does not give clarity as to whether they are all or just some.
He added: “It is established that it must be verified if it is a viable alternative and to verify that the concession is a viable alternative, since it has to be supported by studies that have been validated and reviewed, We did not find any studies that support the decision Clarifying the following is the Government and it is not our job, We are neither against nor in favor of the concession, it is simply an analysis of constitutionality”.
I send a call to the community that does not mean that the process is already invalid because the Court’s decision is missing, which will be known in a period of 40 to 45 days.
