The Administrative Court of Casanare denied the claims of the lawsuits through which they sought the loss of investiture against the councilors of Yopal, Mauricio Efraín Rozo Celis and Karen Tatiana Vargas Unibio.
In the first case, the Court denied the claims of the lawsuit filed by Wilson Andrés Chaparro Cueto that sought the annulment of the election of councilor Mauricio Efraín Rozo Celis for double militancy.
According to the document of the lawsuit, Mauricio Efraín Rozo Celis ran as a candidate for the Municipal Council of Yopal, for the Alternative Indigenous and Social Movement (MAIS), which through a Committee prohibited any type of agreement, alliance or adhesion with candidates of the parties. Cambio Radical and Centro Democrático and that despite this, on August 25, Rozo Celis attended meetings with Marco Tulio Ruiz, Cambio Radical candidate for Mayor of Yopal.
Apparently the plaintiff was unable to demonstrate with the evidence provided to the process that Rozo Celis had carried out positive and concrete acts in favor of the candidate for Mayor of Yopal, Marco Tulio Ruiz.
The document states that “the evidence provided only has the capacity to demonstrate eventual situations, which could have occurred in ways different from how they were presented, without the evidentiary exercise having had other mechanisms that would provide certainty to the former and denote, reliably, that the defendant here offered his political capacity in favor of the candidate of another movement.”
Karen Vargas was also saved
In the case of the only woman elected Councilor of Yopal, the Administrative Court of Casanare denied the claims of the lawsuit through which Yuly Yamay Barón, sought the loss of investiture against the councilor of Yopal, Karen Tatiana Vargas Unibio, for alleged violation of the stops 
campaign financing maximums and lack of means of proof.
The plaintiff Yuly Barón is also part of the political party for which Karen Vargas was elected, whom she accused of having exceeded expenses in the hiring of routes, the delivery of bonuses and questioned the amounts of money that she must have incurred in the holding medical and beauty sessions, which led to the assumption that the spending limits for the campaign were exceeded.
According to the ruling, it was evident that Karen, through testimonies and interviews, was able to clarify that for the health days, sporadic use of the family vehicle and the driver was made for some routes and also that these activities were non-profit services. , so there is no evidence that allows its value to be objectively assessed.
