The Civil and Criminal Chamber of the Superior Court of Xustiza de Galicia (TSXG) has confirmed the sentence of the Provincial Court of Pontevedra that condemned ACinco years in prison and the payment of a fine of 1,620 euros to man that on July 14, 2023 he agreed to the newspaper’s writing The voice of Galicia In the city of Lérez and tried to kill a journalist. This is the same young man who in December 2015 assaulted the one who was president of the Mariano Rajoy government.
Specifically, the Court has considered it Author of a crime of murder in the degree of attempt, of a crime of damage and another of resistance to agents of the authority, with the concurrence, in all of them, of the exempted incomplete of psychic alteration and the mitigating repair of the damage.
As reported Europa Press, The Chamber has, therefore, rejected the appeal filed by the convicted person, who alleged that the Provincial Court erroneously valued the evidence in relation to the mood of killing, since he argues that He acted with the sole intention of causing material damage to the newspaper facilities.
However, the TSXG emphasizes that “the conclusion reached by the sentence is incontestable every time it has the declaration of the victim, one of its companions, of the agents of the National Police, of the forensic and doctors medical experts about the origin, type and entity of the injuries, as well as the statement of the defendant himself.” To this, he adds that, “through such a wide cast of elements of conviction, The sequence of the facts could be rebuilt“.
“The appellant insists that there was no mood to kill, But it must be remembered that it is not necessary for the qualification carried out by the instance room that concurs a direct intent, the eventual intent being sufficient, by virtue of which the author is aware that his conduct can cause death and despise such a risk, maintaining the harmful determination, “explains the high Galician court in the sentence.
In addition, in the judicial ruling, it stands out, in terms of the concurrence of the alevosía, that “it is patarious that it is a surprise action, since the defendant breaks into the offices, and, when the victim leaves the area in which he was working, hearing noise, without more he meets the undertake by the defendant, with which he has no relationship. The aggressor told him that “he was going to kill him,” he gave him “blows with the roller and, subsequently, with the knife, without continuity solution.”
The TSXG states that “The only thing the victim could do was try to stop the blows. “ The sentence is not firm, because it is possible to submit an appeal before the Supreme Court.
