Colo Colo tied 1-1 with Racing Club In the Monumental Stadium, by date 3 of Group E of the Copa Libertadores. The score could be different and favorable for albos, since there was a controversial play in the match when the chief won 1-0.
At the 68th minute Solomón Rodríguez fell in the Racing area after contact with goalkeeper Gabriel Ariaswhen both played the ball after a rebound in a defender of the academy. Neither the Paraguayan referee Juan Benítez nor the VAR considered that the play is a penalty, much less that it is revisable in the monitor.
In the first repetition it is appreciated that Solomon Rodríguez is the one who seeks contact with the goalkeeper to drop in the area, but when analyzing the in -depth play, the fault was sanctioned, and even the review in the VAR. The channel The booklet markswhich has 70 thousand followers on Instagram, delivered the detailed explanation by pointing out the error of the meeting judges.
See too
Javier Correa throws himself against the referee of Colo Colo vs Racing: “Mald, threatens you”
They explain that it was a penalty for Colo Colo against Racing for Copa Libertadores
The Librito marks delivered his explanation in his social networks: “In this play the goalkeeper and an attacker go to the dispute of a deviated pass, and after a clash the attacker falls within the criminal area. Neither the central referee nor the VAR considered that the play could be pointed out as a maximum penalty, but was it right? Although it seems that the goalkeeper tries to protect the ball, he never has the possession of it, and being a ball that comes from a deviant pass it is not considered that someone has possession but is at a distance of the game“.
Leave your opinionSee more comments
“In addition, the goalkeeper never manages to play the ball and decelerate to make an additional movement towards the attacker, I mean his career in the opposite direction to the spherical. On the other hand, the striker always maintains his career to the ball, so the goalkeeper causes contact by becoming an obstacle and committing a zancadilla. So the VAR had to invite the referee to make an OFF (review on the field) to point out this penalty according to rule 12.1 of the IFAB, ”concludes the explanation.
football Regulation indicates that it was a penalty for Colo Colo against Racing
The IFAB (International Football Association Board) is composed of the four United Kingdom FIFA soccer associations, and is responsible for pointing out the Game rules in football. In its article 12.1 it explains the faults in the field of play, when it corresponds direct free kick such as a penalty if it is within the area.
“A direct free will be granted if, in the referee’s opinion, a player commits one of
the following offenses against an adversary in an imprudent way,
reckless or with the use of excessive force:
- carry;
- jump on;
- kick or try;
- push;
- hit or try (headers included);
- make an entrance or dispute the ball;
- Put the Zancadilla or try “
As Gabriel Arias It makes a zancadilla to Salomón Rodríguez in the area, It corresponded that the VAR calls Juan Benítez to see the image on the monitor and analyze whether he keeps his decision not to charge penalty, or reverses it. This did not happen, and finally Colo Colo could not have the clear opportunity to score the second goal to have greater chances of winning the game that ended 1-1.
