May 8, 2025
Updated 08:40
Redacción Teleamazonas.com |
«The members of the Constitutional cut no They will give the via of the procedure so that they have fundamental changes (in the Constitution) », He said Enrique Herreríaformer body of the agency, about the possibility of a constituent assembly.
«It looks unpresentable to maintain a Constitution that over time he has revealed that he has democratic institutions and that they have led to corruption, and is full of impediments for the country advance in development«, Said Herrería this Thursday, May 8, 2025, in the 24 -hour interview space, in Teleamazonas.
-Enrique Herrería said that a constituent assembly in Ecuador is necessary for the development of the country, to promote the foreign investment and for end with the corruption. However, he said that a deep change must be made regardless of the time that the process takes.
The former Constitutional Court said that for the elaboration of this new Constitution, it must not only be oblivious to the political interest but also for Eliminate certain criteria and allow the Capital income and the modernización of the country.
Also read:
In addition, Herrería stressed that the participation of expert and with a cooperation of different Organizations and Guilds Pnow to consolidate a Constitution qthat lasts in the time y satisfy interest of all Ecuadorians. «You have to put people with at least 30 years of experience; that they have a university degree and do not have any process for the crime of public administration, ”he said.
In the changes that should be considered in the Constituent, Enrique Herrería pointed out the elimination of the Council of Citizen Participation and Social Control (CPCCS) to resume the Three functions: Executive, Legislative and Judicial. He also indicated that the Judicial Council must disappear and the entire chapter related to the strategic sectors is eliminated.
Finally, the ex -speechist pointed out that the route of the Partial reform of the Constitution is not the most optimal. He affirmed that in his opinion “the members of the Constitutional Court will not give the procedure so that there are fundamental changes.”
