He Senate of Mendoza approved this Tuesday by a large majority the changes in the way the funds of the co-participation. However, the project had voices against it within the opposition, both from La Unión Mendocina and Peronism.
The changes in co-participation and the human resource management in the state were not accepted for the members of LAUM Ariel Pringles, Valentín González and Marcos Quattrini, Chappel (Green Party) did not vote in favor either, and two Peronists abstained: Félix González and Elio Perviú.
Also, this Tuesday The addendum to use the funds from Portezuelo del Viento was also approved in the Senate -1,023 million dollars- in other public works that are not just water.
provincial senate mendoza.jpg
The senate achieved the approval of two key laws for Cornejo: the fiscal package and the addendum to use Portezuelo del Viento funds in other public works.
The reason for the votes against in the Senate of Mendoza
The senators of LAUM They did not have a joint position to reject this fiscal package. Individually, Pringles referred to the fact that in the chapter where the possibility of carrying out movements of State personnel is determined, this could lead to complications, such as lawsuits by these workers.
Another member of LAUM, Valentín González, He expressed that each chapter of this project could have been presented individually and discussed one by one.
While German Vicchi He was against a law that he perceives as “contradictory” because the State proposes greater controls in some sectors of the public administration and not in others.
As for the PJ bloc, Félix González and Helio Perviú requested permission to abstain, but did not give arguments. Both are related to the Kirchnerist sector.
YOU MAY BE INTERESTED: Mendoza denounced La Pampa for allowing private companies to illegally sell the water that comes from San Rafael
What is at stake in the fiscal package
The most controversial change has to do with the change in the Coefficient of Fiscal Balance. The co-participating funds are distributed 25% in equal parts to all departments, 65% based on the size of the population and the remaining 10% is this coefficient, which was used precisely to balance the funds of the most neglected departments.
Many of the mayors complained because they assured that changing that article is to favor some departments over others.
For this reason, it was the most conflictive but the ruling party then obtained the half sanction in Deputies and this Tuesday, the final sanction in the Senate.
In addition to co-participation, fiscal measures reach other levels, such as the possibility of carrying out employee movements within the Public Administration, more conditions to receive additional contributions from collegiate organizations and a more exhaustive control of human resources. This has to do with increasing rigor in the presentation of medical certificates for license requests.
#Argentina
