Justice set, in principle, 15 days for the arrest of the two drivers of the tragedy in Quimilí. The most delicate accusation fell on Luis Alfredo Maldonado “simple homicide with possible intent”, plus the aggravating circumstance of lacking a driving license and authorization to transport students.
This picture makes the scenario unpredictable for Luis Alfredo Maldonadothe driver of the bus that stopped in the center of Route 6 at dawn on June 4 and led to the tragedy of Alejandra Paola Gómez (18). The young woman and 37 other people were traveling from Quimilí Agrotechnical College towards Los Pirpintos, Copo.
Maldonado and the driver of the 4×4 that ran over 19 people on the shoulder, Silvio Ariel Gerez (39), from General Pinedo, were investigated by the prosecutor, Eugenia Callegarisand preferred to abstain from testifying.
Later, at 11:30, they were taken to a hearing presided over by the Judge of Control and Guarantees, María Pía Danielsen. Gerez He has been charged with “wrongful homicide and wrongful injuries in a traffic accident.”
Alejandra Gómez died in the tragic episode.
Callegaris stated that Maldonado It was not authorized to serve students; He also did not have a driving license. Regarding the reproached conduct, he indicated that he did not make sure to activate the lights and signals – on the route – provided by current regulations.
In turn, the defense of Maldonado, Mirko Slamich (the remainder is Melissa Slamich) stressed that the charges filed demand a “verb”; of a generator of the objected action. In the student’s tragedy, he stated, the bus driver “is innocent,” even though hypothetically “a civil charge could be brought against him.
The truck ended up with its front destroyed.
More pointedly, I ask why the disparity in the accusation. Put in context, “why are the accusations not the same”?, since Gerez He is the one who attacked and killed Alejandra.
Assuming that he is authorized by the criminal figure, the lawyer of Gerez, Dalmiro Cruzstated that the greatest responsibility should fall on Maldonado and, in this sense, asked for the freedom of the 4×4 driver, an employee of a Chaco cable television company.
However, the prosecutor was clear that the investigation is very incipient and there are conclusion measures in process, that is, pending. The verbal duel also included solidarity and the conviction that it had been “an unfortunate accident” that cut short the life of the young girl, who dreamed of becoming an agricultural engineer. At the end of the debate, Danielsen legalized the arrest and converted it into detention, “due to the validity of the procedural dangers.”
#Argentina
