The Barcelona Prosecutor’s Office has requested the file of the second case opened against the Colombian singer Shakira in Spain, accused of defrauding the Treasury of 6.6 million euros (about 7 million dollars).
However, it refers the case to the administrative route to pay the debt that the Treasury claims for the personal income tax (IRPF) and the 2018 property tax.
The other two private accusations filed have also supported the request to file: the State Attorney’s Office – on behalf of the Spanish Tax Agency – and the government of the Spanish region of Catalonia.
It was the Economic Crimes Prosecutor’s Office that filed this second complaint for tax fraud against the singer, but now, after months of investigation, it has concluded that there is not sufficient evidence that she committed crimes against the public treasury.
The singer, in fact, deposited the 6.6 million in court on August 31 that the public ministry and the Tax Agency considered evaded and last February she declared herself under investigation before the judge in a videoconference from Miami (USA). USA), in which he denied having defrauded the Treasury.
In that trial, last November, the Colombian singer accepted the payment of a fine of 7.8 million euros, after an agreement with the Prosecutor’s Office and the Tax Agency that prevented her from going to prison, after assuming that she defrauded 14 .5 million euros between 2012 and 2014.
The complaint whose file the Prosecutor’s Office is now requesting maintains that the singer defrauded the Tax Agency of 5.3 million personal income tax, corresponding to the income from her 2018 international tour ‘El Dorado’, when she lived in Spain, as well as for the transfer of its intellectual rights, and another 773,600 euros in wealth tax for the 12 million it owns in real estate and financial assets.
To defraud the treasury, according to the Prosecutor’s complaint, the defendant used a corporate framework and presented “untrue tax returns” in which she omitted to declare income and deducted expenses that were not appropriate, thereby managing to reduce the tax. fiscal.
EFE