Privacy Policy Banner

We use cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.

Congressmen promote censorship of Gustavo Adrianzén: he denied kidnapping and, when he confirmed death of miners in Pataz, he only published a hashtag

-
Archive Photo of the President of the Council of Ministers of Peru, Gustavo Adrianzén. EFE/Paolo Aguilar

The permanence of the president of the Council of Ministers, Gustavo Adrianzén, wobble. After confirming the Murder of 13 miners in Patazthat, according to him, they had not been kidnapped, different parliamentarians reminded him of his expressions and were in favor of his departure, either through a resignation or . Although it has not yet achieved the required signatures, a motion against the Premier was already prepared.

At the close of the note, it was known that the Motion of censure against the of the PCM is supported by 19 of the 33 legislators necessary to be admitted and debated by the Plenary of Congress. If the number of limit rubrics, it must be put to the representation. With the number equal to or greater than the simple majority of concurrent, it will be given by admitted. Following act, Being the prime , what is known as “total crisis” is generated, that is, You must give up your entire cabinet.

Jaime Quito, Sigrid Bazán, Carlos Zeballos, Pedro Martínez, Alex Flores, Juan Burgos, Luis Picón, Edward Malaga, Susel Paredes, Jorge Montoya, Víctor Cutipa, Ruth Luque, Edgard Reymundo, Roberto Sánchez, Guillermo Bermejo, Elias Varas, Wilson Quispe, Margot Palacios and Silvana Roble They are the officials who, so far, have signed the document in favor of the departure of the head of the Ministerial Cabinet.

Signatures of the motion of
Signatures of the motion of censure against Gustavo Adrianzén.

In this regard, the Congressman not grouped Edward Málaga Trillo He expressed his outrage through social network X, noting that Adrianzén’s statements reflected a disconnection with the seriousness of the facts. “This is only four days ago. On the moon. There is no objective not to censor it”, He wrote, referring to the comments of the Prime Minister, who had claimed that the abduction was a“ false alarm ”.

“What have the emergency states served? What did Adrianzén go to Pataz to promise more police bases? The deployment of police and makes no sense if there are no forceful orders to end that crime. Adrianzén must leave office“He questioned in another publication.

Mininter ordered the investigation of
Mininter ordered the investigation of the of 13 miners.

Silvana Roblesmember of the Socialist Bank, he also strongly criticized the Executive. The legislator accused the of acting on their backs to the population and He recalled that they doubted the veracity of the kidnapping. “This is the of the pro -crime laws and ineffectiveness of the Executive. Neither the emergency or the have been effective. A president and ministers who do not act against violence, cannot continue in office”He said.

-

For its part, Susel walls described the Premier as a “disaster” and shared a publication in which it is mentioned that the reported massacre “It must cost the head of the Ministry of Interior, Julio Díaz Zulueta.” He also recalled that he developed a vacancy motion against President Dina Boluarte and invoked her. “We do not deserve this woman in the government,” he wrote.

Jorge Montoya, of honor and glory, he indicated that “the government cannot continue to be a spectator of violence that plagues the mining areas of the country.” What has happened in Pataz is a tragedy that demonstrates abandonment, impunity and lack of concrete action in terms of security, “he wrote; while Alejandro Muñante, From the popular renewal bench, he described the massacre as a Emergency states failure test. “This situation is the result of policies designed by bureaucrats aligned with non -governmental organizations and rights organizations, which, in his opinion, has weakened the government’s ability to guarantee security in the country,” he said.

Gustavo Adrianzén questioned by words
Gustavo Adrianzén questioned by words expressed about the kidnapping of 13 miners. Photo: PCM

On Wednesday, April 30, at a conference by the Council of Ministers, Gustavo Adrianzén denied the retention of 13 mining workers in the district of Patazin the region of La Libertad. As he explained, there was no complaint and, according to the information obtained through security bodies and bodies, the is not truthful.

“Audios were received that allegedly accounted for these kidnappings, but to date we have no complaints. now I am checking if something else has arrived and I have no variation. We have no news that the fact has occurred. Army patrols and the PNP are coordinating with the local police stations, and the patrol is continued in the critical points of the District of Pataz. I would reiterate the absence of this fact, ”he said then.

So far, although the massacre was already confirmed, the Premier has not yet come out to exercise any mea guilt or clarification. All he has done is to publish through social networks the Hashtag “Lamineríailegalasina”.

-

-

-
PREV The seal “Made in Peru” takes off in the international market
NEXT PATAZ: One of the last videos of the 13 workers killed by illegal mining is viralized