Rosario Bravo’s “method” of family safety that Daniel Fuenzalida did not find “very healthy”: it created a debate among netizens

Rosario Bravo’s “method” of family safety that Daniel Fuenzalida did not find “very healthy”: it created a debate among netizens
Rosario Bravo’s “method” of family safety that Daniel Fuenzalida did not find “very healthy”: it created a debate among netizens

“Are you toxic?” he asked. Daniel Fuenzalida to Rosario Bravo. “I have toxic things,” the tiktokera admitted, who then graphed his situation.

In a new chapter of his podcast How are the weones?he said that “We have an agreement with ‘Carlitos’, which is actually for security: we have GPS with the whole family, ‘Carlitos’ knows where I am at this minute and I know where he is.”

The video creator and nurse referred to her marriage to the cardiologist Carlos Caorsi, with whom he has a small four-year-old son.

“Who adopted him into the family?” “Exhuevo” asked him in reference to that agreement. “I,” she answered, “with the consent of all.”

GPS for security?

“Then you are the toxic one,” launched the animator of Now I fall. “Who can they put GPS on? “That’s not very healthy,” he said, while she replied that “I have nothing to hide”. Immediately afterwards, she checked that her husband was working at the Las Condes Clinic.

If there is nothing to hide, why are we going to use GPS?” he asked himself. “It’s security,” she insisted, who also revealed that they have the same telephone code, since, as she argued, they could eventually call him for some emergency and he is not with his cell phone at hand, for example, in the shower.

Through his Instagram account, Rosario commented on her statements to, apart from the size, clarify that said measure “is not toxic”, because “they are family safety measures!” AND I finish with humor: “Each one with their methods.”

Of course, heAs it generated debate among its followers, Two main positions appear, with some nuances.

On the one hand, there were those who defended Rosario’s method via social networks, although mainly when it comes to children: “Is it so strange for everyone that there is no location of your people?” “I find you absolutely right!” and “In these times, for security, it is the safest thing.” Meanwhile, the other side was opposed: “I find it very invasive”, “This behavior is not healthy and, although they try to justify it, it is totally that of someone who needs to control everything” and “I prefer to find out about bad things the old-fashioned way: if something happens they will call me” , were some of the comments from netizens.

 
For Latest Updates Follow us on Google News
 

-

PREV Marbelle and Diego Santos clash over dogs entering restaurants. “Such miserable and intolerant people”
NEXT China to raise retail prices of gasoline and diesel